WASHINGTON — The paratroopers of Chosen Company had plenty to worry about as they began digging in at their new outpost on the fringe of a hostile frontier village in eastern Afghanistan.
By THOM SHANKER
c.2009 New York Times News Service
Intelligence reports were warning of militants massing in the area. As the paratroopers looked around, the only villagers they could see were men of fighting age idling in the bazaar. There were no women and children, and some houses looked abandoned. Through their night scopes they could see furtive figures on the surrounding mountainsides.
A few days later, they were almost overrun by 200 insurgents.
That firefight, a debacle that cost nine American lives in July 2008, has become the new template for how not to win in Afghanistan. The calamity and its roots have been described in bitter, painstaking detail in an unreleased Army history, a devastating narrative that has begun to circulate in an initial form even as the military opened a formal review this week of decisions made up and down the chain of command.
The 248-page draft history, obtained by The New York Times, helps explain why the new commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, is pressing so hard for a full-fledged commitment to a style of counterinsurgency that rests on winning over the people of Afghanistan even more than killing militants. The military has already incorporated lessons from the battle in the new doctrine for war in Afghanistan.
Read the full story by clicking on link below:
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2009/oct/03/report-cites-bloody-firefight-lesson-afghan-warfar/
Submitted by BILL CORCORAN, editor, CORKSPHERE, http://corksphere.blogspot.com
Saturday, October 3, 2009
MUST READ: REPORT ON BLOODY FIREFIGHT IN AFGHANISTAN
Posted by Bill Corcoran at 4:23 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment